Cloaking
FraudFilter.io
FraudFilter.io describes real-time traffic screening for performance marketers, delivered inline without redirects. The pricing page advertises a 15-day refund policy, while the terms say subscription fees are non-refundable unless an exception applies. Buyers comparing traffic controls should weigh that difference alongside the screening route and integration options.
Editorial review based on public sources, without hands-on testing; facts checked on 2026-10-31.
This page contains no partner link to this service.
- Logo
Service logos remain the property of their owners; we use them for identification only.- Name
- FraudFilter.io
- Category
- Cloaking
- Official site
- fraudfilter.io · No link provided
- Facts checked
One plan, with listed campaign capacity
- Plan model: the pricing page says FraudFilter.io offers one plan for media buyers who need tighter traffic control.
- Trial: the homepage says the service offers a 7-day free trial without requiring a credit card.
- Throughput: the pricing page says the service provides a capacity of 100 requests per second or more.
Inline screening without redirects
FraudFilter says it screens traffic in place, without redirects, and targets invalid traffic. The provider lists VPN, proxy, Tor, crawler, and AI-agent traffic among its screening categories. It also describes filtering VPNs, Tor exit nodes, datacenter proxies, and headless browser rigs.
The provider says custom heuristics can be combined with its threat data.
Advertising platforms prohibit cloaking and may block the accounts that use it; such offers are restricted by law, age, or region. Check network and platform rules and local law. This is not legal or financial advice.
Trial and refund terms diverge
The homepage says the free trial lasts 7 days and requires no credit card. The pricing page advertises a 15-day refund policy, but the terms qualify refunds differently. These statements should be treated as a policy conflict, not as a single clear refund window.
- Pricing page — 15-day refund policy — checked 2026-10-31.
- Terms — subscription fees are non-refundable unless the terms or a separate pricing agreement specify otherwise — checked 2026-10-31.
The terms also exclude refunds or credits for partial periods of use or non-use. Before paying, ask which written terms govern the purchase and what exception applies to the advertised refund policy.
Questions to settle before relying
Ask what the help materials cover, including setup and troubleshooting for each integration route. Ask how the service explains a screening decision and what review controls are available.
Clarify which click details appear in reports, whether logs can be exported, and how deletion is handled. Ask how technical questions reach support and what response process applies.
These questions are practical checks for any traffic-screening provider. Get answers in writing where they affect implementation, reporting, or billing.
PHP, API, and WordPress routes
FraudFilter lists PHP integration, API access, and a WordPress plugin as its connection options.
The provider describes its API routing in two ways: the homepage says it uses the nearest edge node, while another statement describes a global anycast network. Clarify how these descriptions relate before relying on either as an implementation detail.
FraudFilter states that its service handles 100 requests per second per key and that engine execution latency is approximately 5 milliseconds. The provider also says the filtering engine is built in Rust. These are vendor statements, not independently verified performance measurements.
Terms and capacity claims need scrutiny
- Refund policy: the pricing page offers a 15-day refund policy, while the Terms say subscription fees are non-refundable unless the terms or a separate pricing agreement specify otherwise.
- Partial periods: the Terms say the service does not provide refunds or credits for partial periods of use or non-use.
- Terms changes: the Terms say FraudFilter.io may change the terms, and continued use after an update constitutes acceptance.
- Account security: the Terms make users responsible for safeguarding account credentials and activity under their accounts.
- Prohibited use: the Terms prohibit misuse of the service, interference with its operation, and unlawful use.
- Suspension or termination: the Terms say violations may result in account or service-access suspension or termination.
Screening scope spans listed traffic types
- FraudFilter says its screening can identify VPN, proxy, Tor, crawler, and AI-agent traffic.
- The provider says buyers can combine custom heuristics with its threat data.
- FraudFilter describes filtering in place without redirects.
- The pricing page lists city-level geo filtering and IP-type filters for corporate, datacenter, and residential traffic, among other types.
- PHP integration, API access, and a WordPress plugin are listed as connection options.
Compare screening by control and evidence
When comparing traffic-screening providers, check integration effort, available filter controls, and the detail provided in reporting. Compare service terms and whether screening decisions can be reviewed, so the purchasing criteria match the traffic workflow and operational requirements.
Fit turns on inline traffic control
FraudFilter may suit buyers whose traffic workflow matches its stated inline screening and integration options. Its stated scope is traffic screening for performance marketers, with PHP integration, API access, and a WordPress plugin.
Buyers who need settled refund wording should resolve the difference between the pricing page and terms before paying. The fit therefore turns on whether the integration route works for the buyer and whether the applicable refund conditions are acceptable.
What we could not confirm
- Plan price and billing cadence: the amount and billing schedule.
- Independent validation: evidence beyond the provider’s own claims.
- Integration documentation: setup requirements and supported platform versions.
- Privacy and data processing: details beyond the stated click-log period.
- Support service levels: hours and response targets.
Questions on FraudFilter.io’s operating terms
How do users accept the terms?
The terms say users agree by accessing or using the service. This means the provider’s stated acceptance condition is tied to access or use, rather than a separate step described in the terms. Buyers should read the applicable terms before using the service.
Can the terms change after use begins?
FraudFilter.io says it may change the terms, and continued use after an update constitutes acceptance. The terms therefore connect ongoing use with acceptance of updated conditions. Buyers should review the current terms when assessing whether the service conditions remain suitable.
Who is responsible for account credentials and activity?
The terms place responsibility for safeguarding account credentials and activity under the account on users. This assigns account security and account activity duties to the user. Buyers should establish internal access practices consistent with that responsibility.
What contact does FraudFilter list for support?
FraudFilter lists email support. The terms page also directs questions about the terms to its support team.
Which entity do the service pages identify?
The homepage identifies Rain Arrow Limited as the service’s headquarters entity and gives a Hong Kong address. The terms identify Rain Arrow Limited at 14/F, China Hong Kong Tower, 8 Hennessy Road, Wanchai, Hong Kong. The terms provide the more specific address.
What does the provider say about FraudBuster’s history?
The pricing page states that FraudBuster launched in 2011. This is the vendor’s historical statement about FraudBuster; it does not independently establish the history of FraudFilter.io or verify the launch date.
Proceed only when written terms fit
Fits if… the documented screening route and integration options match the buyer’s traffic workflow.
Probably not if… predictable refund conditions are essential before purchase.
Main risk… the pricing page’s refund statement and the terms’ exception-based wording do not align clearly.
Sources
Every fact on this page traces back to a public page listed here, with the day it was read.
- fraudfilter.iochecked
- fraudfilter.io/priceschecked
- fraudfilter.io/termschecked
Notes on the making of this review
Editorial team of Payout Desk. This page rests on the public sources listed above, which Payout Desk checked on 2026-10-31. There was no hands-on testing. The page is updated when the sources change.
Last updated:
Right of reply
If you represent FraudFilter.io and think this entry is inaccurate or out of date, write to us and attach evidence. After the refutation is documented, the entry is corrected or removed. No payment changes what we publish.
- Our contact for replies
- No data available
- Response time
- No data available