Payout Desknotes-to-outlook.com

Payout Desk

Articles and guides

Education and info products

Lead-Magnet

Lead-Magnet logo on the cover of the review

EdTech payouts are weekly, while FinTech and HR payouts are monthly, according to Lead-Magnet’s FAQ. The supplied material contains no competitor entries and no disagreement between sources, so it cannot establish how these terms differ from other networks.

Media buyers comparing CPA networks may find the payout schedule and advertiser charges useful starting points.

Editorial review based on public sources, without hands-on testing; facts checked on 2026-10-31.

This page contains no partner link to this service.

Logo
Service logos remain the property of their owners; we use them for identification only.
Name
Lead-Magnet
Category
Education and info products
Official site
leadmagnet.ru · No link provided
Facts checked

CPL offers and listed network figures

The vendor’s homepage, checked 2026-10-31, supplies the figures and payment models below.

  • Vertical focus: EdTech, HR, and FinTech.
  • Listed payment models: CPL, CPA, Revshare, SP-offers, and hybrid.
  • The homepage lists more than 369 CPL offers.
  • The homepage lists 40,766 webmasters.
  • The homepage lists 107 advertisers.
  • The homepage lists 12 years of operation.

EdTech, FinTech, and HR define the offer

Lead-Magnet describes itself as a CPA network serving advertisers and webmasters. Its stated main verticals are EdTech, FinTech, and HR.

The vendor states that its quality filter protects advertisers from untargeted traffic.

Lead-Magnet states that it was founded in 2014. Its about page identifies Semyon Verushkin as founder and owner. The vendor also says it has participated in shaping the affiliate marketing market since 2014.

Compare networks by written payout terms

In general, compare CPA networks by vertical fit, payment model, minimum payout, schedule, tracking options, traffic rules, and support. Ask for the applicable terms in writing and assess them against the role you plan to take. No competitor entries were supplied here, so this is a selection framework, not a comparison of named networks.

Traffic sources meet filtering and sub-tags

The vendor lists websites, email newsletters, contextual and targeted advertising, mobile, SEO, banners, video, and push notifications as traffic sources. It states that it works with more than 15 traffic sources.

For advertisers, the vendor describes a quality filter intended to protect against untargeted traffic. Its FAQ also says an anti-fraud system filters traffic using more than 15 parameters. These are vendor claims; the supplied material does not independently validate their operation.

Webmasters can pass up to 8 tracking sub-tags, according to the FAQ.

The diagram groups listed traffic sources with the vendor’s stated filtering and tracking controls.
Vendor-listed sources, filter, and sub-tags. Built from facts published on leadmagnet.ru; checked 2026-10-31.

Payout schedules and advertiser charges

Lead-Magnet’s FAQ sets different publisher payout schedules by vertical. The FAQ states that EdTech payouts are weekly, with a minimum amount of 10,000 rubles. The FAQ states that FinTech and HR payouts are monthly, with a minimum amount of 5,000 rubles.

For advertisers, the FAQ lists CPL, CPA, and RevShare as the primary charging models. It also lists a one-time fee for placing a project on the platform.

The same FAQ recommends testing with 1,000 leads and gives 700 leads as the minimum discussion threshold. It lists monthly support subscriptions at 19,500, 29,500, or 39,500 rubles, depending on tariff and project involvement.

The diagram contrasts the stated EdTech payout schedule with the FinTech and HR schedule.
The FAQ lists these schedules and minimums. Built from facts published on leadmagnet.ru; checked 2026-10-31.

Lead data and manager support

The vendor says it supports individuals, sole proprietors, and self-employed people. For advertisers, it expects end-to-end data transmission covering leads and sales.

Advertisers can request a refund of unspent deposit funds, according to the FAQ.

The FAQ says each webmaster is assigned a personal manager to help with issues. Advertiser and partner inquiries are also provided through Telegram accounts listed on the page. The vendor’s media page includes webinars for webmasters and advertisers.

The diagram shows the vendor’s stated project-placement and lead-data conditions for advertisers.
Advertiser-side conditions described in the FAQ. Built from facts published on leadmagnet.ru; checked 2026-10-31.

Advertiser costs and data duties

The FAQ describes several advertiser costs and operating duties.

  • The FAQ lists a one-time 50,000-ruble fee for placing a project on the platform.
  • Lead testing has a volume condition: the FAQ recommends 1,000 leads and sets 700 leads as the minimum discussion threshold.
  • The FAQ lists monthly support subscriptions of 19,500, 29,500, or 39,500 rubles, depending on tariff and project involvement.
  • Advertisers are expected to set up end-to-end data transmission for leads and sales.

These are documented costs and duties, not competitor-relative disadvantages. The supplied competitor block cannot establish relative cons. Other missing details are listed under What we could not confirm.

The diagram lists the three monthly support subscription amounts stated by the vendor.
Tariff and project involvement determine the listed amount. Built from facts published on leadmagnet.ru; checked 2026-10-31.

Listed traffic and partner resources

The vendor lists websites, email newsletters, contextual and targeted advertising, mobile traffic, SEO, banners, video, and push notifications.

  • The vendor’s FAQ says webmasters can pass up to 8 tracking sub-tags with their traffic.

These are listed service features, not evidence of an advantage over other networks.

Fit follows role and vertical

Webmasters can assess the stated EdTech, FinTech, and HR focus against their intended vertical. The vendor says it serves webmasters and advertisers, with payout schedules varying by vertical.

The FAQ says it supports individuals, sole proprietors, and self-employed people. Advertisers can assess the listed charging models and project-placement fee alongside their data-transmission duties. The fit decision turns on whether those written terms match the buyer’s role.

What we could not confirm

  • Integrations and setup requirements.

Questions on payouts and traffic

When are webmaster payouts made?

The webmaster payout schedule depends on vertical, according to the FAQ. EdTech payouts are weekly, while FinTech and HR payouts are monthly. The FAQ also lists different minimum amounts for these verticals; check the applicable terms before joining.

What minimum amounts apply by vertical?

The FAQ lists a minimum amount of 10,000 rubles for EdTech and 5,000 rubles for FinTech and HR. These are vendor-stated thresholds. The stated schedules differ too: EdTech is weekly, while the other listed verticals pay monthly.

Which advertiser charging models are listed?

Lead-Magnet’s FAQ lists CPL, CPA, and RevShare as the primary advertiser charging models. The applicable model is a project-level term to establish with the provider. The FAQ also lists separate project-placement and support charges.

How many tracking sub-tags can webmasters pass?

The FAQ states that webmasters can pass up to 8 tracking sub-tags.

Can advertisers request a refund of an unspent deposit?

Yes. The FAQ says advertisers can request a refund of unspent deposit funds. Its stated condition is that the funds remain unspent.

What support does a webmaster receive?

The vendor says each webmaster receives a personal manager to help with issues. The vendor’s media page also includes webinars for webmasters by company experts. Before joining, ask what help the manager covers and how to contact them.

Decide by role and written conditions

Fits if… the webmaster role matches the stated verticals and payout schedule.

Probably not if… advertiser data-transmission duties or listed charges do not suit the project’s terms.

Main risk… a competitor verdict is not possible from the supplied block; assess the provider’s written terms for the role in question.

Sources

Every fact on this page traces back to a public page listed here, with the day it was read.

Notes on the making of this review

Editorial team of Payout Desk. This page rests on the public sources listed above, which Payout Desk checked on 2026-10-31. There was no hands-on testing. The page is updated when the sources change.

Last updated:

Right of reply

If you represent Lead-Magnet and think this entry is inaccurate or out of date, write to us and attach evidence. After the refutation is documented, the entry is corrected or removed. No payment changes what we publish.

Our contact for replies
No data available
Response time
No data available

Contact · Affiliate disclosure

Other reviews in this category: Education and info products

Back to the reviews